![]() ![]() These junk dealers were concentrated in a five by seven block neighborhood in East Baltimore, whose residents were primarily black and poor. The BCHD found that junk dealers were recycling lead-acid batteries, and then selling the metal and discarding the wooden casings. Within days of learning about the burgeoning epidemic in Baltimore, the City Health Department (BCHD), under commissioner Huntington Williams, took action. In particular, Baltimore’s lead poisoning epidemic during the Great Depression can teach us two things: that framing lead poisoning victims as casualties of larger economic or political forces, rather than focusing narrowly on racial disparities or immediate circumstances, makes them more likely to receive help and that permanently replacing sources of lead as opposed to applying stopgap measures is critical to both the short- and long-term resolutions. Source: Horseless Age 43 (2): 82/Wikimedia Commons.Ĭonsidering past lead poisoning crises, such as the one that struck Baltimore in the 1930s, has the potential to teach us valuable lessons about how current crises in cities like Flint, Michigan, could be resolved. These wood cases were soaked in lead, and burned with a foul, poisonous stench when used as fuelwood by the poor during the Great Depression. ![]() Although some battery manufacturers began using hard rubber cases, many continued to use wood in the 1930s. Once the batteries were depleted, junk yards would recover the lead for re-smelting and discard the wood casing. In September 2004, when Amaiya was about one year old, she was tested and found to have a blood-lead level of less than three micrograms per deciliter.An advertisement for lead-acid batteries, which came into widespread circulation in the 1920s as automobile useincreased. The grandmother testified that there was peeling paint in a "bunch of places" in the apartment and that she complained about the condition every day to the superintendent. Brown.Īlexandra testified at her deposition that the landlord painted and performed repairs inside the apartment on several occasions prior to the birth of her daughter, sometimes in response to verbal complaints about the condition of the paint in the apartment. In 2003, Alexandra, who was still residing in the apartment, gave birth to Amaiya A. At that time, the grandmother's daughter, Alexandra Fildere-Brown, was 12 years old and resided in the apartment with the grandmother. Anne (hereinafter the grandmother) rented an apartment in a residential building owned by the landlord, pursuant to a lease which was renewable every two years. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the landlord's motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging a violation of the RLPHRA and the claim for punitive damages. Additionally, as will also be discussed, we find that the landlord's conduct in this case was not so egregious as to support a claim for punitive damages. We conclude that the plaintiffs lack standing to maintain a cause of action under the RLPHRA. ) for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a landlord's alleged failure to disclose the presence of known lead-based paint hazards. ![]() Among the primary issues we consider on this appeal is whether a lessee's adult daughter and infant grandchild have standing to assert a cause of action under the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 USC § 4851 et seq. ![]() Brown, on whose behalf her mother, Alexandra Fildere-Brown, commenced this action, allegedly sustained injuries as a result of exposure to lead paint in a building owned by the defendant, Maple3, LLC (hereinafter the landlord). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |